Meta’s Privacy Shitshow: When Your Wank Session Becomes Training Data
Oh look, it’s fucking Meta again, shoving cameras on everyone’s faces and pretending it’s innovation. Those slick Ray-Ban smart glasses you’ve been wearing to the bathroom? Yeah, surprise, dickhead—human contractors in third-world hellholes have been reviewing your nudes, your sex sessions, and whatever other depraved shit you film when you think nobody’s watching.
Texas AG Ken Paxton—who’s usually busy being a massive pain in the ass for other reasons—actually managed to do something useful for once and is suing these bastards. Turns out Meta decided that “AI training” was the perfect excuse to have underpaid workers look at your genitals without telling you. Because apparently “consent” is just a suggestion when you’re a trillion-dollar company that gives less of a shit about privacy than a peeping tom with a ladder.
The lawsuit claims Meta failed to disclose that real, actual humans—not some magical algorithm—were reviewing footage captured by these glorified surveillance specs. So that “private” video you took? Some poor bastard making $2 an hour has now seen your asshole. Congratulations, you’re part of the dataset now, you exhibitionist twat.
Meta’s response? Probably some mealy-mouthed bullshit about “enhancing user experience” while they wipe their tears with hu
